 |
High Performance Learning Spaces Part 2
January 2007
2. Wallenberg Hall in Use: Teaching Hebrew in the HPLS
Understanding
Wallenberg Hall as a sociotechnical system requires seeing
it in use in the concrete practice
of teaching and learning. In this section, we present
an extended description of the use of Wallenberg Hall’s
learning spaces in a Hebrew language class. This description
makes clear a point that an analytic decomposition
of the teaching activity could not: that the overall
effect of teaching and learning in Wallenberg Hall
results from the simultaneous presence of a variety
of technical and human resources, all available to
be incorporated into the activity of faculty and students.
Throughout
the academic year, Dr. Vered Shemtov used Wallenberg
Hall’s space and technologies to simulate
everyday situations in which students use the language
skills they are learning. In one class, she set up the
breakout space outside of her room to resemble a movie
theater box office. As students were coming to class,
they “bought” tickets, popcorn, and drinks;
to get into the classroom students had to give their
tickets to an usher. Once inside the class they found
3 rows of chairs all facing the large display screens
in the front of the class. The lights were turned down
low. After all of the students had taken their seats,
Dr. Shemtov turned out the lights and played the opening
scenes of an Israeli movie. After fifteen minutes, she
stopped the film and students rearranged their chairs
into a circle to discuss what they had just seen. Their
homework for the night was to watch the rest of the film,
which Dr. Shemtov had posted on the class website, and
to write a review.
In another class, Dr. Shemtov asked
her students to use their new vocabulary to work together
to design the ideal
classroom. Students broke into teams, with each team
using a Huddleboard™ -- a small, portable whiteboard
stored in racks of five -- to sketch out their design.
The teams took their Huddleboard racks and spread out
throughout the class and the breakout space so that each
could have room to work. Dr. Shemtov and her teaching
assistant circulated among the groups, helping them when
necessary. After fifteen minutes, the teams came back
together in class and presented their work. As is often
the case, time ran out before one team could present
their full work. So, they hung their Huddleboard™ on
a rail attached to a larger whiteboard and then used
the Copycam™ -- a digital camera integrated with
the larger whiteboard -- to take a picture of their design
and save it to the class website. That same group kicked
off the next class by pulling up an electronic version
of their work in front of the class and finishing their
presentation. In a traditional classroom, that group
might have been forced to cut their presentation short,
or to hurriedly recreate their work before class in order
to share it.
Dr. Shemtov also taught her Hebrew Land and
Literature class in the Peter Wallenberg Learning Theater,
a large
central space with three very large projector screens,
each controllable by computer. The topic for one day
was a Hebrew poem about a specific place in Jerusalem.
On one screen she showed an English translation of the
poem. On a second screen, she showed photos from the
neighborhood that was referenced in the poem, and on
the third screen she showed artists’ paintings
of the same scene. Students were thus able to see, simultaneously,
three different representations (text, photo, and painting)
of a specific place in Jerusalem. Dr. Shemtov guided
her students through a discussion of the poem, and the
room’s technologies allowed her to create a layered
context for their discussion.
One of Dr. Shemtov’s
students, a sophomore majoring in religious studies,
commented:
I'm a religious studies
major and I’m
probably never going to build something or do something
with computers
but what I thought was amazing as I was sitting in this
class learning an ancient language that I’m going
to use read texts and do all those other kinds of things
but doing it with technology in a very modern way, and
that they were compatible. And so I thought that was
really exciting and I would encourage you that the humanities
people can also be open to technology. And, if anything,
I think... I learned the language, probably better than
I would have normally just because there were so many
media with which I could interact with to learn language – it
wasn’t just like a textbook. And the fact is, you
know, it’s a living language and I got to experience
that in the class.”
This comment nicely encapsulates
a trajectory of experience that recurred frequently in
discussions with faculty
and students: the first impression is of the technology
itself, an effect that is probably accentuated by
the white walls and neutral tones of the room furnishings;
and over time the technology moves into a supporting
role as the classroom activities move into the foreground.
Forward to HPLS Part 3a
Back to HPLS Part 1
Return to Findings
|